The media is all abuzz about the Miss USA pageant that was held this past Sunday night-not over who won, but who didn’t win. Miss North Carolina was crowned Miss USA in the end, but all of the talk is about the first runner-up, Miss California, Carrie Prejean.
Did Prejean fall on stage? No. Did her swimsuit reveal too much? No. Did she make a scene when she didn’t win? No. The fact is, she lost the pageant because she was honest and said she was against gay marriage.
It all happened when one of the judges, celebrity blogger Perez Hilton, who is openly gay, posed to her this question:
Vermont recently became the fourth state to legalize same sex marriage. Do you think that every state should follow suit, why or why not?”
I have to believe that at this point, Prejean had to know this was not good for her. She could answer it honestly, and possibly alienate the judges and others, or she could give some politically “correct” answer and not be true to herself. Her answer:
I think it’s great Americans are able to choose one or the other. We live in a land that you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. And you know what in my country, in my family I think that marriage should be between a man and a woman. no offense to anybody there, but that’s how I was raised and that’s how I think it should be, between a man and a woman.
Not surprisingly, there was a mixed reaction from the crowd. The expression on judge Hilton’s face also demonstrated displeasure with her response. Later on Hilton’s blog he referred to the answer as the “worst answer in pageant history”, and referred to Prejean as a “dumb bitch”.
According to Hilton, “Miss USA should represent everyone”. I don’t know what statistics Hilton has to back this up, but last I looked not “everyone” in the USA was in favor of gay marriage. As a matter of fact, his own state of California voted it down. Perhaps Hilton needs to step out of his Hollywood bubble for awhile and spend some time with more mainstream Americans.
In Hilton’s own words, Prejean lost because of her answer:
She lost it because of that question. She was definitely the front-runner before that.
Hilton later backed down a bit and said that Prejean could have gotten by with a less “political” answer. Essentially, Prejean could have given a “spin” answer which really was no answer at all. To her credit, Prejean was honest. Is that not what we should desire in people?
Even if the judging panel had gone ahead and crowned Prejean the winner, Hilton would have protested:
I would have gone up on stage, I shit you not, and snatched the tiara off her head and run out the door.
So, Hilton would have accepted her if her beliefs matched his own, or she lied

Carrie Prejean, Miss California
about them, but not if she were honest and transparent. If this is what the Miss USA title is about, Prejean is better off without it. This is typical Hollywood and far-left liberal politics-they preach tolerance, but are totally intolerant of anyone with opinions other than their own.
This is nothing more than bigotry, and it’s increasing against people who don’t hold the same beliefs as the far left. Whether due to religion, or whatever other reason, you just don’t cross them, or else.
Better be prepared: it’s going to only get worse.
Edit: One additional point-what kind of threat was Prejean to the gay marriage movement, anyway? Was a Miss USA going to have any sort of noticeable influence on the electorate on this issue? No. Was it likely that a Miss USA’s opinion on an issue was going to change people’s minds? No. Did she express any interest whatsoever in influencing people’s opinions on this? No. Would we have ever known her stance on this issue had it not been asked in front of millions of television viewers? Probably not.
It all boils down to her beliefs. And that, my friends, is bigotry.